Delayed Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Ischemic Priapism: A Case Study

Introduction: Ischemic priapism (IP) is a urological emergency characterized by prolonged, painful erections without sexual stimuli. If left untreated for over 36 hours, it can lead to irreversible fibrosis and erectile dysfunction. This case study explores a delayed penile prosthesis implantation approach to restore erectile function post-priapism complications. Visit ClinMed Case Reports Journal for more groundbreaking research in this field.

Understanding Ischemic Priapism:

• Caused by venous obstruction due to hyperviscosity, leukocytosis, or medication side effects.
• Prolonged priapism (>36 hours) increases the risk of corporal fibrosis, reducing treatment efficacy.
• Conservative treatments include shunts, but they may not always restore erectile function.

Case Study Highlights: A 36-year-old Moroccan male with a history of chronic myeloid leukemia presented with a 5-day-long painful erection. Despite initial surgical shunting, the patient developed erectile dysfunction and penile shortening. To restore function, a delayed penile prosthesis implantation was performed.

Key Findings:

• Immediate penile prosthesis implantation is debated, but delayed insertion allows for better tissue recovery and reduced infection risks.
• The use of malleable prostheses offers a viable option for patients with corporal fibrosis.
• Drilling fibrotic tissue, as described by Wilson et al., facilitates implant placement.

External Medical Insight: The American Urological Association (AUA) emphasizes early intervention in ischemic priapism to prevent complications, but delayed implantation remains a strategic alternative for patients with fibrosis.

Strategic Link Placement:

• Read the full study at https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.acr.1001028
• Explore more case studies in our Urology Case Reports
• A detailed analysis can be found in our main journal article

Conclusion & Call-to-Action: Ischemic priapism requires timely intervention, and while immediate prosthesis placement is debated, delayed implantation remains a viable alternative. Future research should explore comparative studies between early and delayed implantation approaches.

Explore more studies at ClinMed Case Reports Journal and join the conversation by sharing your thoughts in the comments below!

Disclaimer: This content is generated using AI assistance and should be reviewed for accuracy and compliance before considering this article and its contents as a reference. Any mishaps or grievances raised due to the reuse of this material will not be handled by the author of this article.

You may provide us with feedback in the comments section.