Continuous vs. Interrupted Suturing in Episiotomy Which Heals Better A Clinical Comparison

Introduction

Key Findings from the Study

Conducted over two years at MGM Medical College and Research Centre, this study assessed 200 women with episiotomies 100 each undergoing continuous and interrupted suturing.

Study Parameters:

  • Sample Size: 200 women (100 per group)
  • Evaluation Metric: REEDA Score (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation)
  • Observation Timeline: Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3 postpartum

Results at a Glance:

  • Day 1 REEDA Score:
    • Continuous: 3.07
    • Interrupted: 3.60
  • Day 3 REEDA Score:
    • Continuous: 1.83
    • Interrupted: 2.19
  • Statistical Significance:
    • Healing was significantly faster in the continuous suturing group on all three days (p < 0.05).

Clinical Implications & External Reference

Why Continuous Suturing Is Clinically Preferred

  • Less Post-operative Pain
  • Better Cosmetic Outcome
  • Fewer Materials Used
  • Quicker Procedure Time
  • Improved Healing Score

Conclusion

This study strongly recommends the continuous method of suturing episiotomies using Vicryl Rapid 2.0 as the routine clinical approach for better healing outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Call to Action

Disclaimer: This content is generated using AI assistance and should be reviewed for accuracy and compliance before considering this article and its contents as a reference. Any mishaps or grievances raised due to the reusing of this material will not be handled by the author of this article.