Forensic Fibre Identification Using X-ray Diffraction A Breakthrough in Textile Analysis

Introduction

Study Overview Cracking the Code of Cloth

Textile fibres—whether from a suspect’s clothing or crime scene evidenceserve as valuable trace materials. In this comparative study, researchers examined fresh samples of cotton and polyester fibres using XRD to analyze their internal crystalline morphology. The results demonstrated that even within the same fibre type, variations in diffraction patterns could reliably distinguish between fibres from branded versus non-branded manufacturers.

Key Study Objectives:

  • Analyze natural (cotton) and synthetic (polyester) fibres
  • Compare branded vs. non-branded samples
  • Use XRD to detect unique crystallographic structures

Fibre Forensics: The Power of XRD in Action

Using XRD, the study revealed unique diffraction peaks corresponding to each sample’s internal structure. These patterns served as forensic fingerprints.

Polyester Fibre Comparison:

  • Non-branded: Peak intensity highest at second peak
  • Branded: Peak intensity highest at third peak
  • Clear structural variation highlights differences in manufacturing processes and material purity.

Cotton Fibre Comparison:

  • Non-branded: Third diffraction peak most prominent
  • Branded: Second diffraction peak dominates
  • Variations linked to fibre source, processing, and crystalline integrity

Broader Forensic Implications

The ability to pinpoint fibre origin based on crystallographic fingerprinting enables:

  • Accurate suspect linkage
  • Improved forensic reliability
  • Enhanced crime scene reconstruction

Takeaways

  • XRD analysis distinguishes fibre types based on crystal structure
  • Branded vs. non-branded textiles exhibit measurable structural differences
  • This approach improves forensic matching of trace fibre evidence
  • A robust tool for crime scene to suspect correlation

Related Resources

Join the Conversation